Why volunteers are programming for Nokia free of charge
Nokia has had volunteer developers carry out parts of the programming for one of its new devices. The developers worked free of charge, and in return Nokia had to offer up some of its trade secrets. A study carried out by ETH Zurich examines whether this is a win-win situation for both parties and looks at the motivation on both sides.
Warum Freiwillige gratis für Nokia programmieren
Für ein neues Gerät liess Nokia Programmteile von freiwilligen Entwicklern entwerfen. Diese arbeiteten gratis, dafür musste Nokia Einblick in Betriebsgeheimnisse gewähren. Eine ETH-Studie untersucht, ob das eine Win-win-Situation für beide ist und welche Motivation für beide Parteien dahinter steckt.
Our Nokia article was at the ETH Life front page during an entire day:
Today is a great day: the 2500 issues of our new open source image brochure were delivered - 300kg of dead trees…! The freshly designed 16p whitepaper with 13 statements of Swiss ICT celebrities can be downloaded for free or ordered for CHF 10.00 per copy from the /ch/open website. Now let’s assail policy makers with our open source software marketing campaign!
Have you ever found an interesting book on Google Books and missed the “Download as PDF” button?? Google Book Downloader is a new little open source program which does exactly this (only for educational purposes of course ;) So now I finally can read the book chapter of Tim O’Reilly “The Open Source Paradigm Shift” also offline as PDF (sidenote: I don’t think that Tim O’Reilly thought how far the paradigm shift would go and that today - thanks to open source software - one can download this book for free whereby challenging his business model at the core…).
Authors: Matthias Stuermer, Sebastian Spaeth, and Georg von Krogh (all ETH Zurich)
Abstract: The private-collective innovation model proposes incentives for individuals and firms to privately invest resources to create public goods innovations. Such innovations are characterized by non-rivalry and non-exclusivity in consumption. Examples include open source software, user-generated media products, drug formulas, and sport equipment designs. There is still limited empirical research on private-collective innovation. We present a case study to 1) provide empirical evidence of a case of private-collective innovation, showing specific benefits, and 2) to extend the private-collective innovation model by analyzing the hidden costs for the company involved. We examine the development of the Nokia Internet Tablet, that builds on both proprietary and open source software development, and that involves both Nokia developers and volunteers who are not employed by the company. Seven benefits for Nokia are identified, as are five hidden costs: difficulty to differentiate, guarding business secrets, reducing community entry barriers, giving up control, and organizational inertia. We examine actions taken by the management to mitigate these costs throughout the development period.
Already by looking at the descriptive statistics we see some significant differences between these two communities: E.g. people seem more happy with Openmoko Inc.’s information policy than with Nokia’s secretness. Answering [Nokia resp. Openmoko Inc. is secretive about future plans of Maemo resp. Openmoko.] 46.2% of the Maemo community responded “strongly agree” or “agree” vs. 26.6% in the Openmoko community. Might this be a cause why the average number of hours contributed per week is lower in the Maemo (4.5h) vs. the Openmoko (5.1h) community?
Really insightful results will show us our Structural Equation Modeling on which Sebastian is working heavily these days using R. Let’s hope we finish the paper before the end of my dissertation mid 2009…
The last two days we - our SMI team together with the Chair of Prof. Pius Baschera - spent in the hotel Morteratsch almost 2000m above sea-level close to Pontresina. We discussed intensively our PhD projects (doctoral students), research experiences (post-docs) and practical insights (Prof. Baschera as chairman of Hilti and member of the board of Roche, Schindler, Vorwerk and Ardex) and learned a lot from each other. Particularly I got to understand the concept of Business Model Innovation and the idea of phenomenon-based research agendas.